Steven Crowder And Ben Shapiro Discuss Net Neutrality"

Steven Crowder Net Neutrality Video's analogy to the postal service is the most apt in this video. Most important, it allows the FCC to regulate not just your (hated) broadband provider, but also your favorite internet services. Incidentally under the obama administration in 2011 the FCC started investigating the discrepancies between advertised rates and actual rates (with telemetry data collected from real ISP customers).

To elaborate, the FCC has more power and won't let shit like that happen in Europe because the FCC requires internet providers to gain approval from them of their proposals of creating new technology or creating a new business model to the FCC, which could stop internet providers from getting to their 'corruptive ways' as you think they are going to do in the United States.

And the worst point of this is THE GOVERNMENT DOESNT CONTROL THE INTERNET the only thing they control is that isps must treat all traffic equally. This would essentially allow ISPs to provide a service more akin to cable television, where viewers are limited to whatever options ISPs provide.

Netflix having to pay extortion to deliver services to people already paying for bandwidth and service. However I actually think the biggest threats may not necessarily originate from monopolistic ISPs, but instead from big online internet companies that would like to become effective monopolies online.

Generally speaking, it's ISPs who oppose net neutrality, and content providers who favor it. ISPs have much to gain by being allowed to control what they offer in their pipeline (for example, the streaming services they are already starting), the way Microsoft controls what they offer in their operating system.

It only prevents already established ISPs from regulating their customers Internet usage. It may also make it harder for the next generation of online services to compete, if they have to pay up to be placed in a so-called internet fast lane. The battle between state governments and federal governments will increase as blue states believe that they are protecting the Internet by reinstating net neutrality regulations.

Furthermore, since the ISP is likely your only high speed pipe to the internet, you don't have much in the way of market competition. Net Neutrality makes it for 1 gb of data from source A has to be treated the same as 1gb of data from source B. Now that it's gone, Comcast, Charter, AT&T, Verizon have total control over what we can and can't access on the internet.

How does repealing this regulation help the general public not being forced by isp' s to pay for access to specific websites or social media platforms. Net neutrality doesn't allow companies to specialize in giving you the ability to do what you want to do. Let's say there's an isp that specializes in all things gaming.

ISPs are also prevented from engaging in what's known as "paid priority," where they pay to have certain bits sent to computer screens at a faster rater than others, under net neutrality regulations. Title II (which, recall, is the basis for the catch-all) applies to all telecommunications services"—not just ISPs.

No Paid Prioritization: broadband providers may not favor some lawful Internet traffic over other lawful traffic in exchange for consideration of any kind—in other words, no fast lanes." This rule also bans ISPs from prioritizing content and services of their affiliates.

If I start a buisness on the internet, and a company that is not my buisness or having any direct correlation or deals with tge company has the control to set a pay wall on my site. The big content companies definitively supported net neutrality." They also lobbied to put an exception in the rules for content companies.

Ian Tuttle notes at National Review that when the FCC first attempted net neutrality regulations in 2010, they were only able to "cite just four examples of anticompetitive behavior, all relatively minor." Cell phone networks , which are not subject to net neutrality-esque regulations, don't engage in such anticompetitive behavior.